Call for a free consultation!

(301) 916-5000

Maryland Legal Malpractice Attorney

best lawyer Montgomery County

Best, top, or super lawyer designation in Montgomery County, Maryland

The second most deceptive marketing technique used by attorneys is the use of the designation of best, top, or super lawyer in Montgomery County, Maryland, as determined by a local magazine or an advertising insert.  These rating guides attempt to identify the best or top lawyers in Montgomery County, Maryland in various practice areas, including family law, business law, personal injury, civil litigation, criminal, trials, and appeals.  There is no scientific validity to the selection and rating process used to identify these so-called best or top lawyers in Montgomery County, Maryland.  In fact, these rating guides usually contain a disclaimer stating the same.

The disclaimer in the 2012 edition of Super Lawyers magazine for Maryland candidly states: “THE HIRING OF AN ATTORNEY IS AN IMPORTANT DECISION THAT SHOULD NOT BE SOLELY BASED UPON ADVERTISING OR THE LISTINGS IN THIS MAGAZINE.  NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT THE QUALITY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES PERFORMED BY THE ATTORNEYS LISTED IN THIS MAGAZINE WILL BE GREATER THAN THAT OF OTHER LICENSED ATTORNEYS”.

Unlike the ranking of colleges or the quality of life in different cities, there is no objective criteria to rate lawyers.  At most, the designation of top, best, or super lawyer signifies that the attorney has obtained some degree of popularity in Montgomery County, Maryland.  But you wouldn’t want to choose a football league’s MVP based upon the player’s popularity.  Instead, you would want to award this honor to the player who had the best season based upon measurable metrics, such as touchdowns thrown, points scored, passes caught, or yards gained.

In fact, the use of the designation of “best attorney” or “top lawyer” in advertising actually violates Rule 7.1(c) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Profession Conduct.  This rule prohibits an attorney from comparing “the lawyer’s services with other lawyers’ services, unless the comparison can be factually substantiated”.  According to Maryland Bar Counsel, a Maryland attorney should never use superlatives, such as “top”, “super”, “premier”, “best”, “most aggressive”, or “most successful”, because “it is almost impossible for the lawyer to factually substantiate” such claims.  My advice to clients is to disregard all print and internet advertising that claims that the attorney is the “best”, “top”, “greatest”, or “most” when searching for an attorney in Montgomery County, Maryland.

Articles
Article by Stewart A. Sutton featured in the Maryland Bar Journal:
Emotional Distress Damages - Recoverable in Legal Malpractice Actions
Contact Stewart Sutton

Receive Complimentary Case Consultation

To contact us simply complete this form or contact us using the information provided below.





Name:
Email:
Phone:
Question:

Enter this the text below in the space provided.
captcha

Law Office of Stewart Andrew Sutton, LLC
8 Executive Park Court
Germantown, Maryland 20874
Telephone: 301-916-5000
Fax: 301-916-1201
E-Mail: stewart@stewartsutton.com

  • A Substantial Verdict, Yet No Legal Malpractice December 19, 2014
    In automobile accident cases, injured parties are due no-fault coverage and payments. Insurance companies have the right to refuse to pay for medical treatment which is unrelated to the accident, and often refuse to pay.
  • Malpractice case filed by diocese sent to court December 18, 2014
    The Catholic Diocese of Spokane can take its legal malpractice claim to trial against a law firm that handled its 2007 bankruptcy over priest sex abuse claims, a federal bankruptcy judge ruled. The decision on Wednesday means former Spokane bishop Blase Cupich , who now serves as archbishop of Chicago, will likely have to testify in February about his decisi
  • Relatives and Legal Malpractice December 17, 2014
    This case illustrates the potential mess a law firm can get itself into when it allows employees and their families to do business with them. This particular case, Rodolico v Rubin & Licatesi, P.C. 2014 NY Slip Op 01308 [114 AD3d 923] February 26, 2014 Appellate Division, Second Department led to legal malpractice litigation, commercial litigation, and m
  • Panel Allows Legal Malpractice Case to Go Forward December 10, 2014
    A claim against an Albany attorney can go forward after he failed to show he provided reasonably skilled representation to a defendant facing sex charges or that his legal work was not the proximate cause of damage to the defendant, an appeals court has held unanimously.
  • Wife's Case Dismissed; Husband's Case Survives in Legal Malpractice December 8, 2014
    Standing is a very important issue in legal malpractice. The public policy reasoning behind this stiff standard is that every case, whether criminal or civil would be followed by a legal malpractice case if standing were not an issue.