Are Maryland attorneys required to carry malpractice insurance?

There is no requirement that an attorney in Maryland carry legal malpractice insurance.  In fact, about 20% of Maryland attorneys are uninsured.  That is why it is always appropriate to request that your prospective attorney provide you with proof of insurance.

Defenses to Legal Malpractice

Attorneys who commit malpractice rely upon three main defenses.  First, the trangressing attorney usually will claim that his actions or omissions did not breach the standard of care among reasonable competent practitioners in the same field.   Whether or not the attorney committed malpractice is a question of fact for the jury to determine.   Experts for both sides will testify as to whether or not the attorney’s conduct constituted legal malpractice; and the jury will determine whether or not the attorney breached the standard of care.

Secondly, the transgressing attorney will claim that the client was somehow contributorily negligent.   In one of my legal malpractice trials, a bankruptcy attorney claimed that he filed the client’s Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition after the client’s home had been foreclosed, because he claimed that the client had not informed him of the foreclosure date.   The jury believed the client’s testimony that she had left numerous messages with the attorney’s secretary regarding the date of the foreclosure. 

Thirdly, transgressing attorneys will claim that their malpractice did not cause the clients to suffer harm.   For example, a personal injury attorney may claim that the client would have lost his or her underlying personal injury case at trial, even if the attorney had not committed legal malpractice.  Once again, it is a question of fact for the jury to determine whether or not the attorney’s legal malpractice proximately caused the client’s damages.

Causes of legal malpractice

There are at least 3 reasons why attorneys commit legal malpractice. First, an attorney may be trying to handle a case that exceeds his experience and abilities. Secondly, an attorney may have too much work, which results in certain cases being neglected. Thirdly, an attorney’s judgment may be impaired as a result of substance abuse, alcholism, or mental illness.

Contact Stewart Sutton

Receive Complimentary Case Consultation

To contact us simply complete this form or contact us using the information provided below.

Name:

Email:

Phone:

Question:

Law Office of Stewart Andrew Sutton, LLC
8 Executive Park Court
Germantown, Maryland 20874
Telephone: 301-916-5000
Fax: 301-916-1201
E-Mail: stewart@stewartsutton.com

  • Condemnation, Canine Sniff Searches, Privity for Legal Malpractice July 29, 2010
    The story you have requested is available only to premium access subscribers. Premium subscribers have access to every news story, decision and special report we publish, including a complete one-year searchable archive and exclusive e-mail news alerts. […]
  • Why is this a NY Legal Malpractice Case? July 28, 2010
    Patriot Exploration, LLC v Thompson & Knight LLP ; 2010 NY Slip Op 06217 ; Decided on July 27, 2010 ; appellate Division, First Department presents a discussion of forum non conveniens as well as the question of why this is a NY case? Defendants wanted the case to be moved to Texas, notwithstanding the 2 year statute of limitations. […]
  • Legal Malpractice Insurance Rates July 28, 2010
    Legal malpractice insurance protects professionals from the cost incurred to pay for damages. […]
  • It's Legal Malpractice Thrown in at the End July 27, 2010
    Nelson v. Patterson , 2010 NY Slip Op 31799 [Justice Mdden in NY County Supreme Court] is a case about loans, employment contracts, fraud and, oh yes, legal malpractice. […]
  • Duties to Prospective Clients and Other Third Parties July 25, 2010
    What are your ethical responsibilities and liability issues when meeting with prospective clients? Can they sue you for information provided in an initial meeting, even if no attorney-client relationship is subsequently established? In Colorado Court of Appeals case 07CA2163, Steele v. Allen, 2009 Colo. […]