Call for a free consultation!

(301) 916-5000

Maryland Legal Malpractice Attorney

Best, top, or super lawyer designation in Montgomery County, Maryland

The second most deceptive marketing technique used by attorneys is the use of the designation of best, top, or super lawyer in Montgomery County, Maryland, as determined by a local magazine or an advertising insert.  These rating guides attempt to identify the best or top lawyers in Montgomery County, Maryland in various practice areas, including family law, business law, personal injury, civil litigation, criminal, trials, and appeals.  There is no scientific validity to the selection and rating process used to identify these so-called best or top lawyers in Montgomery County, Maryland.  In fact, these rating guides usually contain a disclaimer stating the same.

The disclaimer in the 2012 edition of Super Lawyers magazine for Maryland candidly states: “THE HIRING OF AN ATTORNEY IS AN IMPORTANT DECISION THAT SHOULD NOT BE SOLELY BASED UPON ADVERTISING OR THE LISTINGS IN THIS MAGAZINE.  NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT THE QUALITY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES PERFORMED BY THE ATTORNEYS LISTED IN THIS MAGAZINE WILL BE GREATER THAN THAT OF OTHER LICENSED ATTORNEYS”.

Unlike the ranking of colleges or the quality of life in different cities, there is no objective criteria to rate lawyers.  At most, the designation of top, best, or super lawyer signifies that the attorney has obtained some degree of popularity in Montgomery County, Maryland.  But you wouldn’t want to choose a football league’s MVP based upon the player’s popularity.  Instead, you would want to award this honor to the player who had the best season based upon measurable metrics, such as touchdowns thrown, points scored, passes caught, or yards gained.

In fact, the use of the designation of “best attorney” or “top lawyer” in advertising actually violates Rule 7.1(c) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Profession Conduct.  This rule prohibits an attorney from comparing “the lawyer’s services with other lawyers’ services, unless the comparison can be factually substantiated”.  According to Maryland Bar Counsel, a Maryland attorney should never use superlatives, such as “top”, “super”, “premier”, “best”, “most aggressive”, or “most successful”, because “it is almost impossible for the lawyer to factually substantiate” such claims.  My advice to clients is to disregard all print and internet advertising that claims that the attorney is the “best”, “top”, “greatest”, or “most” when searching for an attorney in Montgomery County, Maryland.

Articles
Article by Stewart A. Sutton featured in the Maryland Bar Journal:
Emotional Distress Damages - Recoverable in Legal Malpractice Actions
Contact Stewart Sutton

Receive Complimentary Case Consultation

To contact us simply complete this form or contact us using the information provided below.





Name:
Email:
Phone:
Question:

Enter this the text below in the space provided.
captcha

Law Office of Stewart Andrew Sutton, LLC
8 Executive Park Court
Germantown, Maryland 20874
Telephone: 301-916-5000
Fax: 301-916-1201
E-Mail: stewart@stewartsutton.com

  • The Inflexible Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice October 24, 2014
    It's THREE years, and not a day more. In legal malpractice, no matter whether your claim is based on negligence or breach of contract CPLR 214 states that one has 3 years in which to bring the action.
  • Court Adopts Test for Bringing Legal Malpractice Claims October 23, 2014
    A client's failure to appeal in an underlying action bars a legal malpractice suit only where it is determined that the client was likely to have prevailed in the appeal, the state Court of Appeals had decided.
  • Hedge Funds, Insurance Companies and Legal Malpractice October 23, 2014
    Legal malpractice cases come up in all kinds of settings. It may be the individual personal injury plaintiff whose case was not started on time; it may be the car accident in which the doctor's reports failed to give the necessary descriptions of the injury and the case was dismissed, and sometimes it can be hedge funds complaining about loans gone bad
  • A New Rule For Legal Malpractice and Appeals October 22, 2014
    Up to today, the rule in legal malpractice litigation has been that Plaintiff was not required to appeal from a decision in order to sue his attorney. That all changed today with the Court of Appeals decision in Grace v Law 2014 NY Slip Op 07089 Decided on October 21, 2014 Court of Appeals Abdus-Salaam, J. The rule is now that "prior to commencing a leg
  • "Uncollectibility" Is an Affirmative Defense to Legal Malpractice Claims in Washington October 21, 2014
    The Washington Supreme Court addressed two issues of first impression regarding legal malpractice claims in Schmidt v. Coogan , No.