What is a medical “Assignment and Authorization”?

When a personal injury victim does not have health insurance, some medical providers will treat the victim as long as the victim and his or her attorney execute an “Assignment & Authorization”.  This document provides that the medical provider will be paid from the proceeds of the patient’s personal injury settlement or judgment.   If the patient does not receive a settlement or judgment, the patient is still responsible for his or her medical bills.

Both personal injury lawyers and physicians abuse “Assignments and Authorizations”.   If the client has health insurance coverage, the attorney should never refer the client to a physician who will only provide treatment pursuant to an “Assignment and Authorization”.    The reason why is that physicians bill patients without insurance double to triple the amount that they charge patients with insurance.   Even worse, most personal injury attorneys do not attempt to negoitiate a reduction of the medical provider’s excessive charges.    Such a failure on behalf of the personal injury attorney may constitute legal malpractice.

Leave a Reply

Contact Stewart Sutton

Receive Complimentary Case Consultation

To contact us simply complete this form or contact us using the information provided below.

Name:

Email:

Phone:

Question:

Law Office of Stewart Andrew Sutton, LLC
8 Executive Park Court
Germantown, Maryland 20874
Telephone: 301-916-5000
Fax: 301-916-1201
E-Mail: stewart@stewartsutton.com

  • Condemnation, Canine Sniff Searches, Privity for Legal Malpractice July 29, 2010
    The story you have requested is available only to premium access subscribers. Premium subscribers have access to every news story, decision and special report we publish, including a complete one-year searchable archive and exclusive e-mail news alerts. […]
  • Why is this a NY Legal Malpractice Case? July 28, 2010
    Patriot Exploration, LLC v Thompson & Knight LLP ; 2010 NY Slip Op 06217 ; Decided on July 27, 2010 ; appellate Division, First Department presents a discussion of forum non conveniens as well as the question of why this is a NY case? Defendants wanted the case to be moved to Texas, notwithstanding the 2 year statute of limitations. […]
  • Legal Malpractice Insurance Rates July 28, 2010
    Legal malpractice insurance protects professionals from the cost incurred to pay for damages. […]
  • It's Legal Malpractice Thrown in at the End July 27, 2010
    Nelson v. Patterson , 2010 NY Slip Op 31799 [Justice Mdden in NY County Supreme Court] is a case about loans, employment contracts, fraud and, oh yes, legal malpractice. […]
  • Duties to Prospective Clients and Other Third Parties July 25, 2010
    What are your ethical responsibilities and liability issues when meeting with prospective clients? Can they sue you for information provided in an initial meeting, even if no attorney-client relationship is subsequently established? In Colorado Court of Appeals case 07CA2163, Steele v. Allen, 2009 Colo. […]