What is the function of the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission?

The Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission investigates and disciplines attorneys who violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.   Common reasons why attorneys are disciplined include (a) lack of diligence; (b) incompetence: (c) failure to communicate with clients; (d) neglect; (e) failure to abide by client’s decision; (f) dishonesty; (g) criminal acts;  (h) misappropriation of client’s funds;  (i) commingling of client’s funds and (j) failure to disclose a conflict of interest.

The Attorney Grievance Commission can impose the following sanctions against a transgressing attorney: (a) warning; (b) public reprimand; (c) private reprimand; (d) suspension; and (e) disbarment.

Comments are closed.

Articles
Article by Stewart A. Sutton featured in the Maryland Bar Journal:
Emotional Distress Damages - Recoverable in Legal Malpractice Actions
Contact Stewart Sutton

Receive Complimentary Case Consultation

To contact us simply complete this form or contact us using the information provided below.

Name:

Email:

Phone:

Question:

Law Office of Stewart Andrew Sutton, LLC
8 Executive Park Court
Germantown, Maryland 20874
Telephone: 301-916-5000
Fax: 301-916-1201
E-Mail: stewart@stewartsutton.com

  • Legal Malpractice in Criminal Cases: A Claim Rarely Proved February 4, 2012
    In his Criminal Law and Procedure column, Justice Barry Kamins, Administrative Judge of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, discusses the elements of a malpractice action, including a specific pleading requirement that essentially bars actions against defense counsel in the overwhelming majority of criminal matters, so much so, that it is ... (more) […]
  • Judicial Immunity and Malpractice Cases February 3, 2012
    Psychologists and Forensic experts are routinely appointed by the Court to examine and produce evidence for the Court; attorneys similarly are used as guardians ad litem, as Court examiners and the like. […]
  • Continuous Representation in Legal Malpractice February 2, 2012
    The statute of limitations is three years in legal malpractice. It may be extended by the principal of continuous representation. […]
  • The Successor Attorney Problem in Legal Malpractice February 1, 2012
    Assume the following: Plaintiff has a medical malpractice case and retains Defendant law firm to handle it. […]
  • New Jersey Legal Malpractice Lawyers Now Offer Helpful Information on the Web February 1, 2012
    Teaneck's Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C., recently added information to its law firm website to assist individuals, corporations and government entities that have suffered losses due to the mishandling of their case or transaction by hired counsel.Teaneck, NJ January 31, 2012 To meet the growing demand for information about one's legal optio […]